I disagree with your assessment that Obama just talked. At least in Israel there are political ramifications, as his speech is seen as a signal of a new approach to USA-Israel relations. The government is already changing their tone about the two state solutions. The settlement movement declared Obama public enemy number one. They relate to him as "nigger" – "Koshon" in Hebrew.

His speech is seen as a marker of a new attitude that will be followed by action, including freezing of the settlements and giving a real chance for the Palestinians to voice their view on the solution. Obama found the soft belly of Bibi Netanyahu’s government. Most Jews in the USA, and the Obama administration, do not have any understanding of the messianic dreams of the settlers.

However, it could be that I am too optimistic, as I believe that you should watch what politicians do and not what they say. Still, I think that your judgment does not give a reasonable time span or perspective for a new policy to happen.

I think that not only are the settlers afraid of him, but so are Al Qaeda. They notice that Obama presents the Muslim world with new options. He ruins the one-dimensional Bush view of the "axis of evil." Bush made Al Qaeda's work very easy as a recruiting tool. Obama challenges all of us, Jews, Muslims and Christians, to listen to the "other" point of view.

Well, it has been a week since Obama gave his historical speech to the Muslim world in the Mother of the World (Um Al Dunya) in Egypt. Now that the sand has settled and reactions have tempered, it is fair to say that although there was alot of optimism and hype surrounding his landmark speech, not much is going to change. While Muslims can appreciate President Obama for recognizing Islamic achievement throughout history and the need to re-engage based on mutual respect, it will be his actions that will ultimately be judged--particularly concerning the Arab-Israeli/Palestinian-Israeli conflict. 

Israel is continuing its settlements and its policy of displacement. On today's Mosaic, Syria TV reports that a Palestinian man was forced to demolish his home with his own hands so that he would be spared the cost of having to pay for an Israeli bulldozer to do it. Israeli settlers are erecting Obama huts to protest President Obama's calling for a two-state solution and a halt to settlement building. Meanwhile, the Palestinians continue to bicker among themselves over who has the right to represent a people who are becoming more impoverished and more hopeless with every passing day. Arab leaders continue to prove their ineffectiveness as they watch from the sidelines waiting for their cue from Washington, or better yet, Tel Aviv.

Well so much for big talk and small action!

The reaction to the recent nationalist trend in the Israeli parliament has been very negative. As a result, the initiative to make life harder for the Palestinian–Israeli citizens was canceled.

See this YNetnews update for more details.

Still, the undercurrent of total polarization between Israeli Jews and Palestinian Israeli citizens will get stronger. Unless President Obama will signal a new beginning in his speech on the 4th of June, the peace process is frozen.

Polarization will get worse.

David, I agree with you it is a shame that such laws are being implemented in Israel. I share in your outrage. Consecutive Israeli governments have long been annexing Palestinian lands since 1948 and annexing Palestinian culture (i.e. Israeli hummus?) as well as re-writing  history. This is all part of Al Nakba of 1948 (The Catastrophe in Arabic), which Palestinians remember. Israel has been demolishing Palestinian homes for settlement building, razing graveyards, agricultural lands and historical sites. This, in addition to incursions, house invasions, assassinations and bombings, etc. Death and destruction on both sides, committed by both sides. All smaller Nakbas that are ultimately connected to Al Nakba. With this latest move, Israel attempts to further erase Palestinian identity in the country by not allowing the Palestinians to commemorate their own history as they see it.  I am comforted by the fact that Palestinians everywhere will never forget their history or their past. Many of them still hold the key to their homes, which have been either destroyed or taken over.  They dream of the day when they or their children will return to their homeland.

This is an Al Jazeera report that tells the story of the Nakba very well.  

During the recent visit, King Abdullah II of Jordan focused on one subject when talking with Obama: all the roads in the Middle East lead to Jerusalem and Palestine. As Bibi, Israel's new PM, is arriving soon in DC with an Iranian agenda and a timetable, it does not look to me like anyone is on the same page. Israel is organizing a major trial exercise of civil defense in July. Afterwards, all will be ready to attack Iran, unless Obama produces a new understanding with Tehran.

The rhetoric between the President of Iran and Israeli leaders have reached new heights of hate and disinformation. Many times leaders climb up high trees, only to have difficulty descending when the stakes are high. So then war breaks out as words are turned into action, and fighting seems unavoidable. It happened before in our region. The nuclear issue has become a focus for the Israeli goverment, in its relation with the USA. Obama is being tested, as his 'let us talk before we shoot' dialogue diplomacy is only in its infancy. A nuclear Middle East is a nightmare to everyone concerned, and Israel has sworn that Iran will NOT become such a power. There is a timetable of three months before the call will be made by Israeli leaders, and we find out if Obama is helpful, or if his diplomacy is a pie in the sky...

David, it is clear that you have opposed all settlements on occupied Palestinian lands since 1968. If there were more people like you in Israel, perhaps a critical mass would compel consecutive Israeli governments to stop its settlement building, which continues until this very writing. Obviously, having a dialogue about what is happening there is not the same as affecting policy changes on the ground. But our positions on this issue are clear. Since 1967, the Israeli government has been slowly, illegally annexing Palestinian lands through its settlement and security policies--making it almost impossible for a Palestinian state to emerge.

This is a short video, which I believe shows how difficult it is for a two-state solution to succeed. 

Hi Souheila,

I read carefully your friend's advice and I am not surprised. As a guy who lived for 55 years in polarizied Jerusalem this is an understandable and regular reaction. We Palestinian and Israelis have for too long been in a deadly embrace. As for myself I have demonstrated against occupation and specifically against the settlements since 1968! So after 40 years of active opposition in Jeruslaem I moved to SF to have a break. For me, the Palestinian issue is very central to any dialog, and for me the eye to eye level is key to any real understanding.

In Jeruslaem I worked a  lot with Palestinian journalists and started the web site www.amin.org. I also started a dialog of the deaf project that was supposed to connect Palestinian and Israeli deaf children through the internet. Hopefully your friend knows that 99% of the people in the Middle East can hear, but only 5% are listening...

Hi David, as you know we have been sending out information about our blog to various people and networks. I got a  very critical e-mail from a Palestinian man, who lives in Jordan and asked not to be identified. It is a very harsh, but we knew from the start that this dialogue would not be easy. I wondered how you would respond to his e-mail below:

Hi Souheila , Sounds interesting. When you say he has roots the Middle

East are you saying he is Israeli? Even if not the case, please make

sure you are not dealing with a Jewish supremacist by asking him a

direct question as to whether he openly endorses, unconditionally,

elemental human rights for Jews and non-Jews alike  especially the 4th

Geneva convention. If he does not or if he gives a wishy washy answer,

you are doing Muslims, Arabs, and Palestinains in particular a great

disservice by giving a platform to a Jewish supremacist under the

guise of dialog. It's not possible to separate Arab/Mulsim/jewish/israeli

dialog apart.. To do so is to attempt to legitimize Jewish racial and religious

supremacy for the sake of a cordial TV conversation.  The treatment of

Arabs/Muslims in the Holy Land is the white elephant that cannot be ignored.

One cannot be a liberal in the US and a KKK in Israel. I know some will say Palestine

is not everything.

To Blacks, Apartheid South Africa was everything and no

Black, American or others attempted to skip a discussion of apartheid

for the sake of  bogus black-white relations. If you attempt to

sidetrack Jewish supremacy in the Holy Land  you are only falling into

the same trap of those who attempted dialog before you. Only open and

unconditional endorsement of the 4th geneva convention is the

ultimate litmus test before opening a dialog with any Jew. It's

elemental human rights, not philosophy. 

http://www.cicr.org/ihl.nsf/WebART/380-600056?OpenDocument

Sorry is the email comes across too preachy. Best of luck.

The war of information that goes on about Gaza includes a lot of propaganda and denial of wrong doing. It was a classic case of disinformation when the Israeli Army launched a 3 day investigation to find out if Israeli soldiers performed war crimes in Gaza. Of course, it found out and published a statement that Israel's Army is the most MORAL army in the world.

The Hamas also engaged in its investigation about Palestinian pro-Fatah prisoners and how they were treated.  This investigation is a spin on facts that everyone knows. Mistreating pro-Fatah supporters in Gaza has been established before.

So the competition of spin and denial is an ongoing feature of all people in power and movements that claim moral superiority. Disinformation and the work by the Ministry of Truth on all sides is a given. The power of spin and PR

are always evident. But you cannot fool all the poeple all of the time.

Palestinian issue is definitely central to any attempt to  solve and change Mid East-USA relations. However if you read the  recent reports about the way Israeli soldiers relate to Palestinians as moving targets,you must realize the challenges facing OBAMA. Palestinians also distrust American emissaries,and despise Israeli double talk.

The level of distrust and hate between the warring people on the ground has increased many fold in the last 9 years. There is so much work that needs to be done, to get to any real understanding. So even if Obama would declare that Palestine is his priority, he would have to take many preparatory steps.

The President would have to start in DC/Congress to get them out of the AIPAC agenda. How many partners does he have for this? So it is a long road towards the first REAL peace intitaitive.